how to spend $250K

May 24, 2009

first not on you, you’re not as important as you might think. Jesus and his supremacy is far greater.

second, you could look around for some people who are keen on starting something new that helps people to know Jesus like a church plant and invest in them. I like this idea and think its necessary – but to be honest it not how I’d spend my first $250k, but defintely my second $250k. with the right guy, who has the the right message & the right mission in the right context – its a potentially high return – but its also a high risk – and having joined a body of people who in the past decade have blown half a million this way – I think there may be something that is lower risk and higher return as as first measure. 

so third – this is what I’d do first

Find those who are already in place, doing mission with existing reources – and spend the money helping them to do mission better. they’re there, they just not always sure what they are doing. 

you won’t improve everyone this way, but most churches I know have good guys, with the right message and mission but the wrong resources. I’d help them to get simple and clear about what they are doing, realise the potential of the resources they already have at their disposal, and give them the supports for putting in a place a growth orientated process in their churches. 

so what would $250 k buy? 

two things. 

1. leadership consultancy that actually helps churches to be missionally strategic and effective. 

2. leadership consultancy that helps churches to create new capital to fund there new improved mission strategies. 

in my context this will mean 

1. we stopped giving church grants where they throw good money into bad strategies and structures 

2. we plant churches only out of healthy missionally effective and growing structures that can support them. 

3. we reources leaders in existing churches by helping them to mangae their existing captial better whilst creating new captial and structures that will orientate for growth. 

4. when we do give churches grants for new projects, we will be confident that the money will be better spent because there will be better leaders with better structure in place.

5. overseers will have a clear focus, pastoral care of their leaders and facilitating the right consultants for growth.

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized. .

6 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Michael Kellahan  |  May 24, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    Maybe we should have spent the $250k on investment advisors at Glebe?
    Maybe then we’d have some grant money to hand out.

  • 2. David Clarke  |  May 24, 2009 at 11:56 pm

    So Shane, you wouldn’t spend it on a bottomless pit like a heritage building. ;-)

  • 3. Shane  |  May 25, 2009 at 7:43 am

    definitely not David – I would let the NSW heritage council spend their money on such things, and I would help you to create an income stream where property pays for property so you can match every dollar that they offer you.

    MK – lost of potential standing around the corpse and kicking it here!

    as they say” don’t waste a good recession”

    one of the reason the new capital project failed I think was because we thought we had enough already going around

    now we’re thinking a little differently I imagine – and that tension I think will give potential creativity to new capital projects and as you are suggesting – some rationalizations of existing capital.

  • 4. David Blowes  |  June 3, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    I see a lot of leadership consultancy… Why not theological training ?

  • 5. Shane  |  June 3, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    Good question David. You could argue that I take it as a prerequisite or an assumption for the right guys with the right message etc
    Good leadership needs good theology and therfore good training, but I think I would put theologicak training in the category of leadership convictions and mindset, wheras the consultancy or mentoring mentioned here falls into a narrower yet still fundamental skills set that applies wisdom to organisation.
    I think it is fair to say good theology doesn’t mean good leadership skills though leadership skills without good theology means poor leadership in the end.
    Does that make sense?

  • 6. Mike  |  June 3, 2009 at 8:54 pm

    Or you could help someone who actually needs the money…

    you know… do what jesus did…

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

tweets

older stuff

ta da

grrrr